JACS Corner - Exploring Chemistry's Top Journal
For those deeply involved with chemical research, there's a particular publication that often comes up in conversations about top-tier work. It's a place where significant discoveries get shared, a sort of benchmark for many in the field. This publication holds a special spot for a lot of people aiming to contribute something meaningful to scientific knowledge.
This journal, as a matter of fact, is frequently talked about as a premier spot for sharing new chemical findings. People in the field often consider it a real accomplishment to have their work appear here. It represents a kind of high standard for what's considered impactful research.
So, whether you are just starting out or have been working in chemistry for some time, the name of this journal likely holds a certain weight. It signifies a level of quality and influence that many aspire to reach with their published studies. We are talking about the Journal of the American Chemical Society, or JACS, and its open-access counterpart, JACS Au.
- Nia Peeples Husband
- Who Is Harry Jowsey Dating
- Hannah Waddingham Husband
- Lorna Watson Spouse
- Roxie Jamie Pipino
Table of Contents
- JACS Au - Open Access and its Role in the JACS Corner
- How Does JACS' Review Process Work for JACS Corner Submissions?
- JACS vs. Angew - What Are the Differences for the JACS Corner?
- Chem vs. JACS - A Closer Look for the JACS Corner
- What Makes JACS the "Holy Grail" in the JACS Corner?
- Personal Journeys to the JACS Corner
- Is JACS' Impact Really Broader for the JACS Corner?
- The Evolving Prestige of JACS Corner in 2025
JACS Au - Open Access and its Role in the JACS Corner
The publication known as JACS Au, is that, a completely open access journal, meaning all its published works are freely available for anyone to read. This approach, you know, makes scientific knowledge much more accessible to a wider audience, which is a pretty big deal for spreading new ideas and findings. It means that if you are looking for research published here, you won't hit any paywalls or subscription requirements, which is rather convenient for students and researchers alike.
Authors who have their work accepted for publication in JACS Au, more or less, are asked to cover an article publication charge, often called an APC. This fee helps support the open access model, allowing the journal to keep its content free for readers around the globe. The standard license for authors publishing their research in this journal is typically the CC-BY-NC license, which permits others to use the work for non-commercial purposes, with proper credit given, of course.
So, in some respects, JACS Au serves a slightly different purpose than its more traditional counterpart. It offers a pathway for researchers to share their findings broadly, making sure that their contributions can reach anyone with an interest, regardless of their institutional affiliations or access to paid subscriptions. This arrangement, you see, helps to broaden the reach of important scientific work, ensuring it gets seen by as many interested eyes as possible within the scientific community and beyond, which is actually quite beneficial for collaborative efforts.
Sometimes, too it's almost, researchers who might not find their work accepted in the main JACS journal might find a home for it in JACS Au. This doesn't mean the quality is lower, but rather that it provides another avenue for solid research to gain visibility. It’s like having a very good second chance for studies that are still valuable and worth sharing with the broader scientific group, which is pretty common in publishing.
How Does JACS' Review Process Work for JACS Corner Submissions?
When it comes to the main JACS publication, the process of reviewing submitted papers is, you could say, a bit more demanding. They have a rather firm rule that the people looking over the papers cannot be individuals who have had their own work turned down by the journal previously. This policy, it seems, is put in place to ensure a very particular standard of judgment for all contributions hoping to make it into the JACS corner.
Typically, there are about three or four people assigned to review each paper. This number, apparently, helps to get a good range of opinions and insights on the work, making sure it gets a thorough examination from several different perspectives. The idea is to have a comprehensive look at the research, so that, any potential weaknesses or areas for improvement can be identified before it gets published, which is generally a good thing for scientific integrity.
What's also interesting about JACS, you know, is the kind of research they seem to prefer. They tend to publish a very, very large amount of articles related to organic chemistry. For those working in inorganic chemistry, papers dealing with things like MOF and COF structures are particularly favored. This preference, more or less, shapes the content of the journal, giving it a certain flavor that many readers have come to expect from the JACS corner.
The first round of review for a paper submitted to JACS, typically, takes about a month. This timeline gives authors a general idea of when they might hear back about the initial assessment of their work. It's a period of waiting, of course, but it's also a sign of the detailed consideration that each paper receives before any decisions are made, which is pretty standard for high-level scientific journals.
JACS vs. Angew - What Are the Differences for the JACS Corner?
When comparing JACS to Angew, there are some pretty clear distinctions that people in the chemistry field often talk about. For instance, the editors at Angew, apparently, make their initial decisions quite quickly. This fast turnaround, you might think, could be a good thing for authors eager to know where their paper stands, but it also hints at a different approach to the review process compared to JACS.
Some opinions, particularly those shared around 2025, suggest that JACS is seen as far superior to what are sometimes called "small NC" publications. This perspective, you know, indicates a strong belief in JACS's consistent quality and influence within the broader chemical sciences. It's a statement that reflects how highly JACS is regarded by many who follow the field closely, putting it in a very strong position relative to other journals.
On the other hand, Angew, for some specific areas of research, has been described as being a little too open to various submissions. For example, in the field of aqueous zinc batteries, some people have expressed that Angew accepts almost anything, even work that might be considered less than stellar. This perceived lack of strictness, in some respects, has led to concerns that it could diminish the journal's standing over time, potentially impacting its reputation within the JACS corner's broader competitive arena.
So, there's a feeling among some in the scientific community that Angew might be risking its good name by publishing a wide range of work, without perhaps the same level of rigorous selection that JACS is known for. This difference in editorial philosophy, you see, creates a distinct contrast between the two journals, influencing how researchers decide where to send their most important findings, which is a big consideration for publishing.
Chem vs. JACS - A Closer Look for the JACS Corner
The challenge of getting a paper published in Chem is, apparently, quite a bit greater than for JACS. This isn't necessarily because the research quality is always higher, but more often because Chem publishes far fewer articles overall. This lower publication volume, you might say, means there are simply fewer spots available for papers, making the competition to get in much more intense, which is just how it is sometimes.
Chem also, it seems, has a tendency to favor papers coming from established research groups or those led by well-known figures in the field. This preference for contributions from "big names," you know, can make it harder for newer researchers or those from less prominent labs to get their work considered. It's a characteristic that, some would argue, doesn't always reflect the true quality of the science itself, but rather the connections of the authors.
When you look at the average quality of papers in Chem and JACS, they seem to be quite similar, more or less. However, JACS publishes a significantly greater number of truly exceptional articles compared to Chem. This suggests that while both journals feature solid research, JACS simply has a larger collection of what people consider top-tier contributions, which is a pretty important distinction for the JACS corner.
Many researchers, in fact, have published significant works in both Chem and JACS, using either as a primary place for their important findings. For those who work in a very specific, small area of chemistry, they might see slight differences in quality, with Chem perhaps having a very small edge in certain situations. However, for the broader scientific community, both Chem and JACS are generally viewed as being on the same level when it comes to presenting important research, which is a common view.
The difficulty in getting published in both journals is, apparently, quite close. This indicates that regardless of which one a researcher chooses, they can expect a rigorous review process and a high bar for acceptance. So, while there might be subtle differences in their approach or preferred content, both remain very much at the top of the list for chemists seeking to share their most impactful discoveries with the JACS corner and beyond.
What Makes JACS the "Holy Grail" in the JACS Corner?
In the field of chemistry, JACS, which stands for the Journal of the American Chemical Society, is often spoken of with a very high degree of respect. It's frequently called the "Holy Grail" of chemistry journals, a term that really highlights its esteemed position. This kind of praise, you know, isn't given lightly; it reflects a widespread belief in the journal's exceptional quality and influence across the chemical sciences.
This publication, in some respects, is considered the absolute top choice, receiving the highest possible marks from those in the field. It represents a place where, honestly, every person working in materials science and chemistry dreams of having their research appear. The idea of getting a paper published in JACS is, apparently, a significant career aspiration for many, symbolizing a major achievement in their scientific pursuits.
The strong reputation of JACS, too it's almost, has been built over many years, making it a benchmark for excellence. When someone mentions publishing in JACS, it immediately conveys a sense of rigorous research, significant findings, and a high level of scientific contribution. It's a name that carries weight, pretty much, in academic circles, and it opens doors for researchers seeking recognition for their hard work and discoveries in the JACS corner.
After JACS, there are other journals that also hold considerable prestige, but JACS itself often sets the standard. Its long history of publishing groundbreaking work has cemented its status as a premier venue for chemical research. It's a journal that, you know, consistently attracts some of the best and most impactful studies, which further reinforces its standing as a leader in the scientific publishing landscape.
Personal Journeys to the JACS Corner
For one individual, a chemistry student at a "211" university, the experience of working with a professor during their spare time led to an interesting outcome: a paper published in JACS, where they were listed as the third author. This achievement, for an undergraduate, is quite remarkable and, apparently, a very significant boost to their academic profile, especially when considering applications for graduate studies or summer research programs.
This particular student, you see, was thinking about applying for graduate school and was curious about how a JACS publication, even as a third author, would be viewed within the chemistry community. They also wanted to understand its impact on opportunities like summer camps, which are often competitive. This kind of experience, more or less, shows the practical benefits of getting involved in research early in one's academic career, particularly when it leads to a publication in a respected journal like JACS.
Another researcher shared their personal story of getting a first-author paper published in JACS, among others like NC and EES. Their experience, you know, provides a helpful example for others. This specific JACS paper was in the field of electrocatalysis, and its path to publication was quite a winding one, showing the persistence often needed to get work into such a respected journal.
The journey for that electrocatalysis paper, as a matter of fact, involved several attempts before finally finding a home in JACS. It was first sent to Nature Catalysis, where it was turned down without even going out for review. Then, it went to Advanced Materials, and again, it was not sent out for review. This series of rejections, apparently, can be quite disheartening, but it also highlights the high standards and competitive nature of top-tier scientific publishing, even for strong research, which is a common experience.
Finally, after these earlier attempts, the paper found its way to JACS, where it underwent the review process and was ultimately accepted. This story, you see, is a testament to the perseverance of researchers and the varied paths that scientific papers can take before they are finally published. It also underscores the idea that sometimes, the right fit for a paper might not be the first journal you think of, which is pretty true for a lot of authors aiming for the JACS corner.
There was also a case where a paper, submitted in January, went through a process involving two minor revisions and one rejection at JACS before ultimately being accepted by JACS Au. This situation, you know, illustrates how sometimes, even very good papers might face initial setbacks at the main JACS journal before finding success in its open-access counterpart. It shows that the road to publication can be full of twists and turns, even for work that is considered high quality.
While some papers, particularly those from very well-known researchers, might appear to be accepted quite easily, perhaps through invitations, the experience for many others, often referred to as "little guys," involves a lot more effort and persistence to get their work published. This difference, more
- Chevy Chase Spouse
- Jamal Murray Girlfriend
- Mario Casas Sierra
- Nickelback Chad Kroeger Wife
- Terri Welles Playmate
JACS Solutions | Linthicum Heights MD
Journalism and Communication Society - JACS
(@jacs_adelaide) • Instagram photos and videos
